|

Acknowledgements
This document is the result of the combined
efforts of management, concessionaires, neighbouring
communities and other key stakeholders that are involved
with or affected by Pilanesberg National Park (PNP).
The process was facilitated by Willie Boonzaaier of
CONTOUR Project Managers CC, ably assisted by Roger
Collinson of Collinson Consulting.
Special mention needs to be made of the
dedicated PNP Management Team, under the competent leadership
of Matsima Magakgala, General Manager: Protected Areas
Management, with whose assistance this Second Edition
of the PNP Management Plan was developed:
Norman Mathebula
Pieter Nel
Johnson Maoka
Mike Crowther
Bruce Brockett
Gus Van Dyk
Mandy Momberg

1 PREFACE
Pilanesberg National Park (PNP) is located
in the North West Province of South Africa. Prior to
its establishment in 1979, most of the land was used
for farming. Since 1979, PNP has undergone major reclamation
and development and has now matured to a fully stocked,
well managed and world renowned National Park, which
is not only hosting the "Big Five", but has
also become home and breeding ground to an impressive
list of rare and endangered species.
PNP has become a significant anchor project
in the region and is managed by the North West Parks
and Tourism Board (formerly Bop Parks), a conservation
organisation that is world-renowned for its pioneering
approach to people-based wildlife conservation which
it has practised since 1979.
The Board believes that if conservation
is to succeed in developing countries such as South
Africa, then local communities and individuals must
benefit significantly from wildlife conservation and
related activities. If local communities and the region
as a whole can benefit through jobs and business opportunities
that are created or generated, the firm support for
protected areas will be obtained and important conservation
objectives will be met almost as a secondary or spin-off
benefit.
PNP is run as a three-way partnership
between the State (represented by the North West Parks
and Tourism Board), local communities and the private
sector. Without doubt, it is the private sector on which
the entire project ultimately depends. The private sector
develops and manages a variety of tourism developments
and activities in PNP. The revenue generated from concession
holders and entrance fees is used partly to maintain
the tourism bulk infrastructure and conservation infrastructure
and game stocks in the reserve on which the private
sector has based its own investment and operations.
If surpluses do occur, a portion of these revenues may
be used to finance community-based development projects.
In addition to community projects, communities also
benefit from jobs and business opportunities that are
created both within and outside PNP. This in turn further
stimulates the local and regional economy.
This partnership, therefore, is of benefit
to all parties involved - conservation objectives are
met, the private sector generates profits, jobs and
businesses are created, communities are developed and
valuable foreign exchange is brought into the country.
PNP is a model for other Protected Areas. It aims to
balance its primary objective of conserving biodiversity
and its unique geological and natural landscape assets
with its secondary objective of optimally utilising
its commercial, educational and recreational potentials;
as an alternative and viable land-use option; to the
benefit of an entire region.
PNP therefore should not be looked at
as solely a protected area or tourism destination -
in truth, PNP is a mature tourism anchor project that
acts as a major social and economic core and engine
around which the development of the entire region is
based. It is strongly believed that the approach being
practised in PNP will have significant beneficial impacts
on local and regional economies, as well as greatly
contribute towards the overall improvement in the quality
of life of largely disadvantaged rural communities and
individuals. People-based wildlife conservation, therefore,
should be considered as a viable development option
elsewhere in South Africa and in developing countries
in general, especially in rural areas where development
options are very limited. In this respect, it is believed
that people based conservation offers the only long-term
successful approach to wildlife conservation in South
and southern Africa and the continent of Africa as a
whole.
PNP will be the most heavily used and
developed big-game Park in Africa. It will have the
most developed surroundings; a 550km2 island of natural
landscape in a sea of urban and industrial development.
Outdoor recreation facilities including "satellite
Parks" will also be developed in the near proximity,
as high-density outdoor recreation alternatives to PNP.

2. INTRODUCTION
1.1 BACKGROUND TO PNP
Pilanesberg National Park (PNP) is 50 000 hectares in
size and is located in the North West Province of South
Africa, 150 kilometre north west of the Gauteng metropolis
and 60 kilometre north of Rustenburg.
1.1.1 Geology
Geologically, the area is world famous. Its structure,
termed the "PNP Alkaline Ring Complex" was
formed by volcanic eruptions some 1 200 million years
ago. Ancient, even by geological time scales this extinct
volcano is the most perfect example of an alkaline ring
complex. There are only two other alkaline volcanoes
in the world, in Russia and in Greenland. Neither are
as clearly defined as PNP. A number of rare (but not
necessarily economically important) minerals occur in
PNP. PNP clearly rates high amongst the world's outstanding
geological phenomena.
1.1.2 Diversity
Apart from its unique size, shape and rock types, the
volcanic origin and resultant weathering of the extinct
crater has resulted in a wide variety of landscapes
and associated vegetation communities. This provides
some of the most spectacular scenery in Southern Africa.
It also provides a wide range of habitats for game animals.
Because of this, PNP has the potential to carry a wider
variety of game species than any other similar sized
game reserve in Southern Africa. Its potential for supporting
rare and endangered species such as black rhino, roan,
sable, tsessebe, foot-and-mouth free buffalo and wild
dogs is particularly high. Thus apart from its conservation
value, the area has very high game viewing and resource
products potential.
1.1.3 History
The history of PNP is also unique amongst national parks
in Africa. PNP's special features of rugged landscape,
well-watered valleys and attractive dwelling sites have
made it a preferred site for human settlement for thousands
of years. Prior to its proclamation as a reserve in
1979, the PNP Complex was degraded and depleted of indigenous
game populations due to fairly intense settlement by
commercial farmers. At considerable expense, the land
has been restocked with game, the scars of human settlement
were removed and tourism infrastructure was developed
during the first 15 years (1979 and 1993). This constituted
the largest and most expensive game stocking and land
rehabilitation project ever undertaken in any African
game reserve at the time. A 110 kilometre peripheral
Big Game fence was erected over some very rugged terrain,
188 kilometre of visitor roads have been developed and
more than 6000 head of game were introduced during the
Operation Genesis game translocation programme. Thus,
while wildlife resources are rapidly declining in most
developing countries in Africa, PNP is one of the few
areas where this trend has been dramatically reversed.
For this far-sighted action the North West Province
(Previously Bop Parks) and its people have received
worldwide acclaim and recognition. The challenge that
lies ahead is to further develop and manage PNP in such
a way that the conservation, cultural, recreational
and economic benefits of this far-sighted action can
be optimally utilised to the benefit of current and
future generations.
1.1.4 The Challenge
PNP's present situation is also unique. Only Nairobi
National Park in Kenya shares its close proximity to
large urban complexes. In Africa, no other game reserves
of comparable size are within such easy reach of a major
tourism market and international gateway. Furthermore,
being situated immediately adjacent to the Sun City
/ Lost City Complex, PNP's potential for attracting
visitors must be unequalled in Africa. The main challenge
is to optimally utilise this vast tourist potential,
whilst still protecting the heritage values of PNP.
In Africa, PNP must have unequalled potential as an
ecotourism destination. It therefore also has a responsibility
to the wildlife industry in Africa, to be developed
and managed as a model, proving its ability to achieve
self-sustainability and contributing to the regional
economy.
1.1.5 Previous Studies
The most important studies that have shaped the development
of PNP are;
· the ecological report by Willem Van Riet and
Ken Tinley [PNP - Planning and Management Proposals,
August 1978];
· the internal ecological publication on range
conditions and large herbivore carrying capacities by
Roger Collinson and Pete Goodman [Inkwe No 1., Environmental
Research in Bophutatswana, March 1982];
· the development plan by Willie Boonzaaier,
Roger Collinson and Willem Van Riet in 1983 [A Five
Year Development Plan for PNP, September 1983]; and
· the study on introduction of lion by Deborah
and Frank Vorhies [Introducing Lion into PNP: an Economic
Assessment, 1993].
1.2 MANAGEMENT PLAN
1.2.1 Other Management Documents
This document is one in a series of management documents
that jointly aim to provide historical and archive material,
sketch the current situation, provide policy and strategic
direction and give guidelines for the day-to-day management
of PNP, as demanded by Section 30 of Act No. 3 of 1997:
the North West Parks and Tourism Act.
Management maintains the following reports as important
management tools:
· "Volume I: A Description and History
of PNP" which should be updated monthly as
a permanent archive of technical information on PNP.
· "Volume II: The PNP Situation Analysis
Report" which is a situational review by management,
every two to five years, depending on prevailing circumstances
and the speed of change.
· "Volume III: The PNP Management Plan"
(this document) which is updated as a strategic overview
by the Board, every two to five years, following the
aforementioned review.
· "Volume IV: The PNP Management Manual"
which is updated annually, as a guideline for all managers,
clearly specifying the various management functions,
objectives and standards.
· "Volume V: The PNP Operations Manual"
which is updated monthly by the technical and operations
staff, as an operational guideline and training tool.
1.2.2 Purpose
The aim of this document (the third in the series) is
to provide a broad policy framework for the PNP. The
Plan sets out the key objective of PNP, defines the
responsibilities and modus operandi of the role players,
gives a brief description of the natural resources occurring
in PNP and the stocking plan that has been adopted by
Park Management.
1.2.3 Structure
The Plan also defines the visions, policies and operational
guidelines that govern PNPs ecological management, the
zoning of uses, the involvement of the private sector,
marketing, infrastructure, community development and
land issues.
This document therefore summarises the policy framework
and strategic thinking for medium- to long-term development
and management of PNP.
1.2.4 Process
This Management Plan was developed in full consultation
with all stakeholders, including management, concessionaires
and communities, and after full review of the current
internal and external environmental factors that affect
PNP and its future. A situation analysis report was
drafted that summarises the results of this consultation
process and forms the basis upon which this Management
Plan was developed [CONTOUR, PNP Management Series -
Volume II, Situation Analysis Report, June 1999]. Any
changes to the broad policies statements of this Management
Plan need to be authorised by the Board before such
new policies can be adopted and the Plan amended. The
policies set out in the Management Plan are translated
into operational procedures, which may be changed by
Park Management provided they do not deviate from the
overall policy guidelines.
1.3 PNP PARK MANAGEMENT TASK TEAM
The structuring of functions within PNP follows the
recommendations of the North West Tourism Master Plan
[DBSA, CONTOUR, Carruthers VC, A Tourism Master Plan
for the North West Province of South Africa, October
1998].
The PNP Park Management Task Team is a sub-committee
responsible for all development and management aspects
of PNP and their impacts on the surrounding region.
These include;
· formulating development and management budgets;
· inviting and initially regulating private sector
involvement in PNP, through The Board's commercial arm;
· helping set up necessary community institutions,
including the PNP Tourism and Conservation Forum; and
· establishing relations and strengthening ties
with outside communities, through the PNP Tourism and
Conservation Forum.
In addition, the PNP Management Team is responsible
for formulating and, where necessary, seeking approval
for all plans, budgets, policies and procedures relating
to PNP. This Management Plan, for instance, was drafted
under the guidance of the members of the PNP Management
Team.
1.4 DEFINITIONS
For the purpose of the Management Plan, the following
definitions apply:-
· The Board refers to the members of the North
West Parks and Tourism Board as nominated on compliance
with the "North West Parks and Tourism Board Act,
Act no. 3 of 1997" and any amendments thereto;
· The Chief Executive Officer refers to the Chief
Executive Officer of the North West Parks and Tourism
Board;
· Park Management refers to North West Parks
Board and Tourism Board staff appointed by The Chief
Executive Officer to manage the PNP;
· Development Task Team refers to a sub-committee,
which is called the PNP Development Task Team, that
was appointed by The Board at a meeting held on 25 June
1999; and
· Parks Board refers to the organisation and/or
relevant people appointed to carry out specific tasks
as the case may be.

3. MISSION, OVERALL VISION AND OBJECTIVES FOR THE PARK
1.7 PNP's VALUES AND OBLIGATIONS
PNP is recognised as the protected area within the North
West Province with the highest economic potential and
the second highest environmental value [Davies R, et
al, A Review of the Protected Areas under the control
of the North West Parks and Tourism Board, June 1998].
When developing and managing PNP, all the Board's policies,
plans and actions must;
· be in the context of the Board's generic mission
as outlined above;
· attempt to fully capitalise on its high economic
and environmental values referred to above; and in addition
· strictly comply with a number of important
specific values & obligations ensuing from:
- The National Park status conferred on the area by
the IUCN
- The global uniqueness of the area's geomorphic origin
and consequent landscape and rock types
- The high potential PNP has for making an important
contribution to national and international biodiversity
conservation and species survival programs, especially
with regards to black and white rhino conservation and
large predator reintroduction programs
- Promises and commitments made to the communities that
vacated PNP and/or gave up resource use rights within
PNP
- The private sector and community based tourism and
allied industries that have "mushroomed" in
and around PNP on the basis of previously implied or
documented rights, agreements, contracts and/or expectations
- The prestigious national and international reputation
PNP has earned over the years for its pioneering policies
and dynamic approach to park management
- The example PNP has set in developing strong conservation
values and park management competencies amongst previously
disadvantaged employees and neighbouring communities.
1.8 PNP's CHALLENGE
The challenge ahead in the development and management
of PNP is to fulfil the Board's mission without compromising
or neglecting the above values and obligations.
Essentially the challenge is to achieve an even balance
between strong conservation values and obligations on
the one hand and strong socio-economic values and obligations
on the other.
As such, the challenge for PNP is different from a protected
area such as Madikwe Game Reserve where the balance
is tilted in favour of socio-economic values and obligations.
Alternatively PNP is different from a strict nature
reserve such as Rustenburg Nature Reserve where the
balance should be tilted in favour of strong conservation
values and obligations.
1.9 PNP'S KEY OBJECTIVES
In accordance with the above, the key objective or purpose
of PNP is to contribute towards and support the Board's
mission by;
· conserving the system's biodiversity, abiotic
resources [soil, water and rock] biophysical processes,
unique landscape and historical / archaeological sites;
· while at the same time utilising the system's
renewable natural resources for the enduring socio-economic
benefit of the neighbouring communities primarily, and
international, national and provincial stakeholders
secondarily.
1.10 PNP'S VISION
The medium term vision for PNP is that it achieves its
key objective to the extent that within the next ten
years it becomes indisputably recognised internationally
as one of the world's leading parks and the flag ship
of the N/W Province. This international and national
recognition is attained through a combination of the
following factors:
· PNP and the quality of its conservation management,
consistently provides a Big Five game viewing experience
that competes favourably with Kruger National Park and
the other well known game reserves of Africa.
· For the more discerning "ecotourist"
who has progressed beyond the Big Five experience, PNP
is renowned for the enriching and informative nature
experiences it offers through innovative world class
interpretation programmes.
· Although the recreational, educational and
spiritual opportunities are maximised to the extent
that PNP supports a higher density of visitors than
any other "Big Five" game reserves, the quality
of the visitor's wild African experience is not unduly
impaired and conservation values and obligations are
no unduly compromised.
· The visitor facilities and services in and
around PNP consistently meet the global standards demanded
by international, national and local visitors.
· All tourism development and management is undertaken
by the private sector in accordance with mutually beneficial
and synergistic relationships with Park management and
neighbouring communities.
· PNP enjoys the understanding, appreciation
and committed support of the neighbouring communities
through a process of shared benefits, environmental
education and participation in park planning and policy
formulation.
· The biodiversity, biophysical processes, non
renewable resources and landscape of PNP is well conserved
through a consistently applied adaptive management process
founded on up to date scientific knowledge, state of
the art technology, and state of the art process modelling,
efficient and repeatable monitoring systems and regular
evaluation and review by experienced ecologists.
· PNP becomes an internationally renowned centre
for park management and conservation research especially
in the fields of rhino conservation, large predator
management, experimental conservation and tourism models,
adaptive management and the socio-economic aspects of
park management.
· PNP is fully recognised as an integral and
important component of the local and regional economy
with its contribution regularly monitored and objectively
quantified.
· PNP achieves financial sustainability through
a combination of maximising income from sources such
as entrance fees, concession fees and consumptive utilisation,
cost effective management including zero based budgets
and guaranteed funding support from Government on the
basis of the meaningful and verifiable estimates of
PNP's contribution to the regional economy.
· PNP is competently managed by a well trained
team that is truly representative of South African society
especially with regards to race and gender.
· All of the above is achieved by successfully
applying state of the art "home grown" models
that are developed and refined through a dynamic process
of adaptive strategic management supported by a pioneering
and innovative culture.
· The end result is a Park that is revered by
the national and international conservation fraternity
as an icon of protected area management on the continent.
1.11 ROLE PLAYERS
To achieve the Key Objective and Vision, the responsibilities
of the three partners in the development, management
and operation of PNP are as follows:
1.11.1 Parks Board
As a general principle, the Board is responsible for
providing and ensuring that all conservation infrastructure
is managed according to the plans, objectives and policies
as set out in this document. The Board will further
encourage, facilitate and co-ordinate the involvement
of the private sector and local communities through
agreements where necessary.
1.11.2 Private Sector
The private sector is invited to participate in developing
and operating any commercial wildlife / tourism related
ventures in and around the reserve in a socially and
environmentally responsible manner through agreements
with the Board.
1.11.3 Local Community
The local community is responsible for developing democratic,
transparent and legally-bound institutions that can
manage the economic benefits that may arise from the
operation of PNP to the benefit of all their members.
1.12 IMPLEMENTATION POLICY
Development projects in PNP will be implemented in such
a way as to maximise socio-economic benefits to all
role players. Specifically, the Board will only involve
itself with implementation and management of projects
when there is evidence of market failure and the private
sector and / or the community cannot or will not manage
a project. The Board, however, maintains overall control
of these projects.
1.13 FUNDING
The funding for Park developments will be sourced in
accordance with the needs of the respective role players.
The Board merely acts as a catalyst to stimulate tourism
developments and community projects by providing development
and operational funding for bulk infrastructure and
conservation of PNP. These funds will be sourced through
government grants and from loans generated according
to the feasibility of each project.
In recognition of its status as one of the prime ecotourism
destinations in Africa, combined with the fact that
the support infrastructure in PNP has now properly matured,
the Board has as an immediate minimum requirement, the
total financial self-sufficiency of tourism operations
within PNP. In the medium term, it is also expected
that conservation and community programmes of the Board
will be subsidised by tourism operations within PNP.
The private sector is responsible for its own funding
requirements.

4. NATURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
1.14 VISION
The biodiversity, biophysical processes, non-renewable
resources and landscape of PNP is well conserved through
a consistently applied adaptive management process.
The ecological management of PNP is recognised nationally
and internationally as a successful model of efficient
and cost effective use of human and financial resources
for the achievement of natural resource conservation
objectives.
PNP becomes an internationally renowned centre for park
management and conservation research especially in the
fields of rhino conservation , large predator management,
adaptive management and the socio - economic aspects
of park management.
1.15 OBJECTIVES
1.15.1 Primary Objective
The primary objective is to maintain the systems present
biodiversity in all its forms and to minimise any visual
impairment of the "natural" land scape. [Realistically
this objective can only be achieved by defining the
limits of change that are acceptable in terms of climatic
cycle fluctuations and the satisfaction of the secondary
and tertiary objectives given below. Limits of acceptable
change should be approved and reviewed periodically
by the Board on the basis of expert advice, but in the
full knowledge that setting such limits involves a great
degree of value judgement].
In attempting to achieve this objective, special consideration
should be given to genotypes, gene frequencies, species,
sub species, communities and habitats that are threatened
or endangered outside PNP. This special consideration
should be applied in the following descending order
of priority; internationally, nationally, provincially
and locally.
Because many of the "natural" bio physical
processes of the system have been disrupted by historical
human interventions and the present interventions such
as fencing, barriers to natural fires etc., the maintenance
or rehabilitation of "natural" bio physical
processes cannot be adopted as a realistic primary objective.
Nevertheless, contemporary ethics and laws pertaining
to soil and water conservation and state of the art
scientific knowledge pertaining to resilience and equilibrium
/ stability concepts should be adhered to as an ancillary
objective.
1.15.2 Secondary Objective
The secondary objective is to provide visitors to PNP
with a highly marketable game viewing and other nature
based activities and experiences provided that this
does not compromise the primary objective.
1.15.3 Tertiary Objective
The tertiary objective is to maximise income and other
benefits from the consumptive utilisation of PNP's natural
resources provided that this does not compromise the
primary and secondary objectives.
1.16 POLICY
As it is unrealistic to assume that the system's biotic
and abiotic components can be conserved through "natural"
ecological processes the policy is to apply management
interventions for the achievement of ecological management
objectives. This Policy does not necessarily imply a
policy of simulating and or rehabilitating "natural"
processes as in many cases this may not be feasible
in terms of current knowledge, current technology, time
and financial resources. Nevertheless, to encourage
systems reliance through original ecological processes,
especially natural selecting, and to keep management
costs to a minimum, management interventions should
also be applied in situations where primary, secondary
and/or tertiary objectives are clearly being met in
the absence of management interventions.
It shall be policy to restrict plant and animal species
introductions to those that were historically indigenous
to the Pilanesberg and the surrounding plains.
1.17 STRATEGY
In the light of imperfect knowledge and technology,
and a stated policy of management intervention, the
overriding strategy is to consistently apply an adaptive
management process founded on;
· a comprehensive natural resource data base;
· unambiguous and measurable objectives and goals;
· continuously updated scientific knowledge and
state of the art technology;
· state of the art systems modelling of ecological
processes;
· efficient, effective and repeatable monitoring
systems; and
· regular evaluation and review by experienced
ecologists and systems modellers.
The secondary strategy is to develop a motivated team
of staff with the commitment, skills and competency
to achieve the primary objective, while providing them
with the necessary equipment, tools, training and funding
1.18 OPERATIONAL GUIDELINES
1.18.1 Alien Plant Control
It is policy to forbid the introduction of alien plants
to PNP including gardens of staff housing and tourist
facilities and lodges. The objective is to remove all
existing alien plants in PNP including staff housing,
gardens, tourist facilities and lodges. Plans for eradicating
alien plants must include a five year follow up control
procedure and be based on the latest alien plant control
technology and knowledge. Cost effective must be important
criteria when selecting control methods. Plans that
do not have a five-year follow up procedure and guaranteed
budget for actioning the procedure must be rejected
outright.
1.18.2 Veld Burning Programmes
It is policy to regard veld burning as an important
intervention for achieving primary and secondary and
tertiary ecological management objectives. The strategy
is to apply a patch mosaic burning programme being randomly
implemented annually in terms of time and space. However,
the desired random strategy must be compromised to some
extent for the achievement of the secondary and tertiary
ecological management objectives. The application of
the random mosaic burning programme is the responsibility
of PNP manager with advice provided by ecological services.
1.18.3 Bush Encroachment Control
At this stage the assumption is that the patch mosaic
burning programme will control the eruption of woody
plants to the extent that alpha, beta and gamma diversity
objectives are achieved. Consequently it is policy to
only initiate large-scale bush control programmes if
monitoring results indicate that fire is not suppressing
the encroachment of woody plants effectively. Nevertheless,
it will be policy to undertake some bush clearing for
the enhancement of game viewing for visitors eg - along
roads, around water points, view points etc. As with
alien plants, bush encroachment plans, must be cost
effective and have a five-year follow up procedure with
guaranteed funding.
1.18.4 Water Point Provision
As the historical processes of game movement in relation
to water availability have been disrupted considerably
by the closed nature of the PNP system and the drying
up of springs due to erosion it is impracticable to
try and simulate and or rehabilitate these processes.
A policy of providing artificial water points for game
is acceptable in the PNP situation. The number and distribution
of water points must be designed to achieve the secondary
and tertiary ecological management objectives without
compromising the primary ecological objective.
1.18.5 Soil Erosion Reclamation
While soil erosion is a "natural" geomorphic
process, the acceleration of soil loss due to unsustainable
land use practices and developments must be minimised
in the PNP system. Logistically, this is best achieved
by preventing excessive overgrazing by wild herbivores
and the wise use of fire. The existing sheet and gully
erosion should be left to rehabilitate without management
interventions as it is firstly extremely difficult to
distinguish between what erosion is merely the result
of a natural geomorphic process and what is the result
of unsustainable land use processes. Further more, it
is extremely costly to rehabilitate sheet and gully
erosion by means of management interventions.
1.18.6 Large Herbivore Stocking Rates
In the absence of any data to the contrary it is assumed
at this stage that the primary, secondary and tertiary
ecological objectives are best attained by stocking
the large wild herbivore populations at a level that
lies somewhere between the ecological and economic carrying
capacity of the system. Furthermore, it is assumed that
these objectives will be attained by adhering to the
principle that bulk grazers should be stocked at a high
proportion of the total stocking rate, concentrate grazers
and mixed feeders at intermediate proportions and browsers
at a low proportion of the total stocking rate. It is
also important to maintain species that prefer sour
grasslands and or steep slopes at higher proportions
of the total stocking rate than species that prefer
"sweetveld" and or flat terrain. The operational
manual provides more detailed guidelines on the stocking
rates for individual species and feeding classes.
1.18.7 Predator Management
Predator Management must be based on the latest research
and experience relating to predator/prey relationships,
social behaviour, population dynamics and reproductive
biology of the various predator species concerned. While
the simulation of the predator/prey dynamics of an open
system, is a noble ideal, it is most unlikely that this
can be successfully attained in a closed system the
size of PNP. Adaptive management is therefore the best
approach to follow at PNP which will probably necessitate
management interventions from time to time to control
predator numbers and sex and age structures. Such interventions
may include culling, live sales and birth control methods.
The introduction of animals from time to time to ensure
the maintenance of genetic diversity may also be undertaken.
1.18.8 Problem Animal Control
Animals that become a danger or excessive nuisance to
persons and property due to either habituation or aberrant
behaviour may be destroyed humanely or captured and
removed from PNP. This applies also to animals that
escape from PNP or leave and return to PNP from time
to time. To minimise the need to control problem animals,
efforts must be made to take preventative measures such
as educating the public and alerting them to various
latent dangers. In cases where the solution to he problem
lies in destroying or capturing animals the measures
in procedures followed must be robust to the ever present
threat of criticism from animals rights and other "green"
movements.
1.18.9 Consumptive Use of Natural Resources
It is policy to permit the consumptive use of natural
resources in PNP, provided that:
· it is necessary for achieving the primary ecological
objective; and / or
· it is sustainable and provides meaningful revenue
to PNP and/or benefits to the neighbouring communities;
and
· it does not compromise the primary and secondary
ecological management objectives; and
· it does not compromise the values and obligations
outlined in Section 3.2 above.
1.18.10 Control over Illegal Use of Natural Resources
Illegal utilisation of PNP's natural resources has always
been low, but still remains a latent threat. Because
of the conservation and economic value of particularly
its game populations and the growing threat of poaching
within the greater southern African region, it is policy
to retain an ongoing vigilance through the maintenance
of cost-effective surveillance and monitoring programmes
and reaction capacities. Due to the law of diminishing
returns, these programmes and capacities will be primarily
focussed on rare- and endangered as well as economically
valuable game species.
Considering the historical access to PNP by previously
disadvantaged communities, the main effort towards resolving
illegal utilisation of natural resources for purposes
of subsistence, will be to create understanding and
awareness through a pro-active education campaign amongst
these communities. Management will however be ruthless
with those that illegally harvest natural resources
for commercial purposes.
1.18.11 Waste Disposal
Park Management and private operators and developers
must adopt a responsible and environmentally friendly
waste management plan. Specifically, liquid waste should
be handled on-site according to a formal development
plan. Solid waste should be separated and sorted on-site
and recycled where possible, or disposed of in consultation
with Park Management.
1.19 MONITORING
Monitoring must be regarded as the most important step
in an adaptive management process. The responsibility
for monitoring lies with PNP Manager and he must regard
this as one of the most important tasks of his team.
The Ecological Services division must develop the monitoring
techniques and procedures, train PNP management staff
to apply these, and interpret the data. Ecological Services
should also revue the suitability and effectiveness
of these techniques from time to time. The monitoring
techniques and procedures applied must be based on the
following:
· Related to adaptive management assumptions.
· Based on the latest ecological monitoring theory.
· Cost effective and appropriate for application
by Park management staff.
The techniques and chosen for application must be consistently
used over an extended period, including climatic cycle
fluctuations, and only amended or disbanded if a panel
of experts rules that they are clearly in appropriate
and or a vastly superior technique and procedure has
been developed.

5. TOURISM MANAGEMENT
1.20 VISION
Within the constraints of the appropriate zones, PNP
will have all its diverse features fully but aesthetically
developed for a wide range of visitors. The hallmark
of management will be the skilful blending of visitor
facilities and intensive use, with a high level of preservation
of aesthetic landscapes, biodiversity and natural ecological
functions.
1.21 POLICY
PNP will continue to serve as wide a range of markets
and activities as possible and their solution to tourism
pressures will be dealt with through intensive visitor
management programmes rather than narrowing down the
target markets. It will also pro-actively facilitate
the integration of PNP's tourism products with other
products and opportunities outside PNP - specifically
within neighbouring communities.
It is also policy to optimise the tourism potential
within PNP through appropriate public/private partnerships
in line with the Tourism in GEAR Strategy which subscribes
that "tourism should be government led, private
sector driven, community based and labour conscious".
1.22 OPERATIONAL GUIDELINES
1.22.1 Self-drive vs. Guided Activities
PNP will cater for both self-drive as well as guided
game viewing activities. All non-vehicular activities
have to be guided, due to the presence of dangerous
game, except in the instance of approved self-guided
trails in designated areas such as in intensive visitor
use zones.
1.22.2 Management of Tourism Activities and Visitor
Densities
Park Management will remain flexible regarding visitor
carrying capacities, rather than setting fixed limits
on visitor numbers. Park Management will therefore implement
a variety of visitor management techniques that are
aimed at increasing visitor carrying capacities whilst
reducing impacts. Possible strategies include;
· the strategic placement of tourist facilities,
comfort stations, activities and amenities that will
reduce traffic into the centre of PNP;
· the surfacing of certain peripheral visitor
roads;
· constant monitoring of visitor profiles, patterns
demands and attitudes;
· limiting vehicle entries to acceptable levels
during peak periods;
· the selective provision of visitor information;
· the provision of conducted activities, visitor
education and -information programmes; and
· special arrangements such as subsidised conducted
drives over peak periods, open days during the off-season,
etc.
1.22.3 Peripheral Developments
An immediate strategy will be to phase out accommodation
facilities and visitor comfort stations from the basin
and to explore new opportunities on the periphery. This
will simultaneously reduce the impact on the basin whilst
increasing the visitor carrying capacity. This action
will also make it possible to utilise further development
potentials along the western boundary.
The peripheral development strategy should also include
the facilitation of new developments outside PNP that
can divert internal pressures, stimulate the creation
of new regional products and generate new benefits and
opportunities for local communities.
1.22.4 Monitoring of Visitor Densities and Attitudes
Visitor entries, usage patterns and visitor reaction
to current densities need to be closely monitored, so
that the situation can be managed for as long as possible
without having to set rigid limitations on entry levels
and without having to apply a fixed policy regarding
self-drive game viewing.
1.22.5 Access Control
A standardised visitor-friendly entry system that will
also cater for entry control and market intelligence
requirements will be in force. The system has to meet
the needs of visitors, concessionaires and management.
If cost-effective, such a Park entry system may be out
sourced.
1.22.6 User Fees
Park visitors (including concessionaire guests) will
pay an entry fee proportionate to their length of stay
and/or in accordance with the season of their visit.
This may also include a differential rate for "in-season",
"off-season", "mid-week", "weekend"
or "peak season" visitors" as well as
affordable rates for certain target markets such as
local communities, pensioners, etc.
1.22.7 Visitor Management
The Board will ensure that they have legislation in
place that will allow Park Management appropriate powers
to effectively enforce Park rules and regulations, as
provided for in Section 31 of Act No. 3 of 1997 : North
West Parks and Tourism Board Act, 1997.

6. ZONING
1.23 VISION
PNP will be zoned to organise the development, visitor
access and resource management of PNP, thus minimising
potential conflict between various user groups. PNP
will be zoned for the widest variety of tourism uses,
with less emphasis on trophy hunting over time, as the
benefits from tourism prove to outweigh that of hunting.
Zoning will be a function of;
· the overall concept for PNP and its surroundings;
· accessibility for identified target markets;
· the physical, aesthetic and other potentials,
capacities and constraints of the terrain;
· suitability for specific types of developments
and activities;
· access to support infrastructure; and
· linkages and relationships with neighbouring
zones, developments and activities.
1.24 POLICY AND GUIDELINES
PNP Management Task Team will decide on the zones and
their location in PNP. Various categories of zones have
been identified and are shown on the MAP (Click
here to view map). The criteria for each zone will
be developed along principles accepted by the International
Union for the Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources
(IUCN).
1.24.1 Wilderness Zones (WZ)
These are areas set aside for the conservation of the
natural ecosystem, with limited outside interference.
Access is restricted to low density, non-vehicular and
high quality guided activities that do not scar the
landscape or the environment and may be shared by more
than one concessionaire. No permanent developments other
than water supply and peripheral management infrastructure
will be allowed.
1.24.2 Wildlife Touring Zone (WT)
The largest zone in PNP is set aside for access to the
general public as a medium to high density self- guided
and guided wildlife touring zone, to satisfy their desire
and right to enter state land. Outdoor recreational
facilities and extensive visitor comfort stations may
be provided within this zone, to optimise the carrying
capacity of PNP. Developments should however be kept
away from the central basin and as close to the periphery
of PNP as possible, to minimise the impact and optimise
the carrying capacity of the interior.
1.24.3 Exclusive Use Zones (EU)
These are areas in the immediate environs of a lodge,
which is agreed to through negotiation with PNP Management
Task Team. Broadly, the number of beds will affect the
size of the zone, concession fee paid, capital costs
of the development and its location with respect to
unique natural features. While operators are not restricted
to this zone, they do have exclusive use in it. Park
Management, however, retains access and all management
rights in these zones at all time. The operator retains
any agreed development rights subject to Environmental
Impact Assessment (EIA) and possible renegotiations
of concession fees and carries any costs associated
therewith.
1.24.4 Restricted Communal Use Zones (RCU)
These areas are central or unique areas or features
of PNP that are preserved for use by all concessionaires
on an equal basis, but is not available to self-drive
visitors.
It must be realised that the economic viability of the
reserve is directly related to income generated from
concession fees. Accordingly, the Board is bound to
maximise income without detracting from the exclusivity
to which the concessionaires are entitled. An area that
will always have permanent access to all concessionaires
include the Baile plain in the north-west.
1.24.5 Intensive Visitor Use Zones (IVU)
These are areas with intensive facilities and activities
for educational and interpretative purposes and may
allow self-guided trails. These zones are accessible
to all visitors. To optimise visitor experiences, intensive
habitat and wildlife management may occur.
1.24.6 Private Development Sites
These are areas of land which are fenced into the reserve
through agreements with the Board, but which are owned
by private individuals, companies, trusts, communities,
etc. No access is allowed to these areas unless by prior
arrangement with the landowners. Park Management, or
their nominated agent, will obviously have access for
control purposes.
1.24.7 Hunting
No portion of the reserve is permanently reserved for
hunting. This activity will be conducted under strictly
controlled conditions in areas periodically identified
for this purpose by Park Management with due consideration
being taken of other visitor activities and concessionaire
rights. Normally, hunting will not take place in exclusive
use zones, but could occur in exceptional circumstances.
1.24.8 Other Resource Use
No portion of the reserve is permanently reserved for
resource use (eg. wood collection, thatch harvesting,
etc). Such activities will be conducted under strictly-controlled
conditions in areas periodically identified for this
purpose by Park Management, in consultation with an
ecologist, and with due consideration being taken of
concessionaire rights.

7. PRIVATE SECTOR
1.25 VISION
As a guiding principle, the Board encourages private
sector involvement in PNP in all aspects that can be
handled in a cost-effective, socially-responsible and
practical manner and which meet with the Board's quality
requirements.
All developments, investments or contracts undertaken
must maximise the number of local people employed and
the company or individual must be committed to developing
the skills available in the area for the contract of
development, where appropriate. Where possible, the
work should be subcontracted out to local people if
the skills are available. Priority will be afforded
to those local people who wish to participate in PNP
and its related activities when opportunities arise.
1.26 POLICY
In the spirit of the operation of PNP, it must be stated
that the private sector, Park Management and the community
are all shareholders in PNP. Good communication between
these parties is therefore essential.
The private sector is seen as an important party in
PNP, responsible for the planning, development, management,
marketing and financing of lodge and hotel developments,
as well as implementing projects and managing them on
a contract basis where appropriate. These activities
will create opportunities, such as jobs and small businesses.
Where practical and feasible, these should be directed
at the local people first. Should there be obstacles,
especially regarding development and training needs,
it is the responsibility of the private sector to identify
these and address them where possible. In addition and
where it proves cost-effective and meets required quality
standards, supplies should be sourced locally. Local
people and businesses should be afforded priority where
possible.
1.27 DEVELOPMENT & OPERATIONAL GUIDELINES
1.27.1 Selection Procedure and Criteria
All concession opportunities will be advertised publicly
and contracts will be awarded according to formal Board
Policy and Procedures and after adjudication against
pre-set selection criteria.
1.27.2 Concession Allocation Authorities
For new lodge or hotel developments or for concessionaires
to operate in the reserve, lease agreements must be
entered into. The return from every concession should
be commensurate with its rights, impacts and benefits
in terms of the zoning policies, but should also be
capable of at least making a proportionate contribution
towards self-funding of tourist activities within PNP.
For leases or concessions whose time period validity
is for fifteen years or less, the Chief Executive Officer
may approve the agreement. It is specifically recorded
that these leases may not be extended beyond the fifteen-year
period without the approval of the Board. These may
be awarded on a demand basis according to reserve capacity,
which will be determined by PNP Management Task Team.
For leases in excess of fifteen years, approval from
the Board is required. These leases must be awarded
through a public procurement process with the assistance
of the Board's commercial division, but are administered
by Park Management once they are operational.
1.27.3 Proven Industry Role-players vs. Local SMME's
Generally, leases and contracts will be awarded to companies
or individuals that have a good proven track record
in the industry. However, for smaller contracts or leases,
opportunities may be given to smaller newly established
companies or individuals. Priority will be afforded
to local people where quality, time and standards are
commensurate to the reserve's needs.
1.27.4 Park Rules and Regulations
Developers, concessionaires and contractors must operate
within defined codes of conduct and rules that are in
place. These will be circulated by Park Management and
may be amended by Park Management from time to time.
1.27.5 Limits of Development and Use
All concessionaire agreements will have explicit limits
placed on sizes and levels of development, type and
level of activities and on the nature and capacities
of traversing rights.
1.27.6 Concession and Entry Fees
For the right to operate lodges, camps, etc. and concessions
in the reserve, a concession fee will be levied.
The concession fees are determined by the Chief Executive
Officer of the Board for concessions of fifteen years
or less and by the Board for periods in excess of fifteen
years. They are set in consultation with the PNP Management
Task Team and the Board's commercial division with the
express intention of at least making a proportionate
contribution towards self-funding of tourist activities
within PNP, in accordance with the following criteria:
· Size of development
· location within the reserve
· timing and nature of the development or operation
and
In addition to the concession fees, an entrance / user
fee will be levied for each visitor. Although the Board
determines this, the PNP Warden in certain circumstances
may waive it.
1.27.7 Allocation of Concession Fee Income
All fees levied and all income earned will be paid to
PNP. All of these funds will be used for the following:-
· to contribute towards the development and operational
costs of PNP's tourism infrastructure;
· to contribute towards the development and management
costs of conservation within PNP; and
· to contribute towards PNP's community development
projects and programmes.
1.27.8 EIA's
All developments must be done according to a formal
development plan, for which an EIA must be carried out
in accordance with Board requirements. The plan must
be agreed to by PNP Management Task Team and may not
be deviated from without consent. Also refer section
10.3.2.
1.27.9 Lease Development & Concession Agreements
In order to facilitate all of the above, appropriate
agreements will have to be implemented between the relevant
parties for each allocated concession, in accordance
with a set format.
1.27.10 Numbers of Concessionaires and Developments
Concessionaire and visitor numbers will be set according
to the following criteria:-
· to ensure PNP's tourism developments and activities
are financially viable;
· to ensure that a significant contribution is
made to the management and conservation of PNP; and
· to stimulate economic activity and social benefits
within the region.
Although these criteria will be optimised within the
constraints of the conservation policies, this will
be done with due regard to the quality of the tourism
product being offered.

8. MARKETING
1.28 VISION
PNP is recognised as a prominent anchor project within
the most significant tourism node of the North West
Province. The PNP's role as an anchor project within
a prominent tourism destination, PNP's history and successes
in applying innovative and adaptive management models,
including concepts such as sustainable use of wildlife
resources, community involvement and private sector
participation, must be marketed to the public.
1.29 POLICY
As a general principle, those who stand to benefit from
the marketing of the particular product must carry the
costs associated with the marketing. However, no marketing
or the contents thereof is permitted that conflicts
with the operations, policy or management guidelines
of the reserve.
1.30 OPERATIONAL GUIDELINES
1.30.1 Respective Marketing Roles
There are four components of marketing:
· the selling of the concept of the PNP, which
includes the philosophy and policies of PNP. This is
the responsibility of the Chief Executive Officer;
· the initial selling of development sites and
concessions to the private sector. For concessions of
less than five years, PNP Management Task Team will
do this. For concessions longer than five years, this
will be done by The Board's commercial arm (or an agent
appointed by them) after consultation with PNP Management
Task Team and the Board;
· the marketing of the lodges. This will be undertaken
by the individual lodges or concessionaires; and
· the marketing of PNP and the region. The Board
will endeavour to ensure that state agencies include
PNP in regional or national marketing campaigns.
1.30.2 Joint Marketing
There may be some opportunities for both the Board and
the private sector to market lodges and the reserve
jointly. Where this is appropriate, the parties should
work together. Close liaison between the parties should
be encouraged.
1.30.3 Screening of Marketing Material
All marketing material concerning the reserve should
be screened by Park Management to avoid creating false
impressions about PNP. If this is not done, the Board
may not be held liable for any statements concerning
issues relating to the Board's management of PNP and
surrounding areas and creating the impression that they
speak on behalf of the Board.

9. COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION
1 VISION
Recognising that Pilanesberg National Park has had and
will continue to have a significant impact on neighbouring
communities and will not be able to achieve its objectives
without their understanding and appreciation, it is
envisaged that the Park will have the support of all
neighbouring and affected communities, especially those
that were directly affected by the establishment and
existence of the Park.
It is also envisaged that Pilanesberg National Park's
stimulus to the local and regional economy will be recognised
and that it will therefore be seen as an important vehicle
through which rural development and transformation is
achieved.
1.1 OBJECTIVE
The primary objective of Community Participation is
to fast track community and emerging entrepreneur access
to tourism activities and opportunities in and around
Pilanesberg National Park, to stimulate local economic
activities and job creation. [This will result in public
understanding and support for Pilanesberg National Park
and its projects and programmes, as a valid and beneficial
land use option].
1.2 POLICY
Pilanesberg National Park, in line with national policies,
has an important role in community empowerment generally
and participation specifically, as acknowledged in the
vision above. Capacity building within communities is
however a non-core activity of the Park and will therefore
be facilitated by optimally utilising the resources
and capacities of other support institutions.
· The Park will therefore;
· establish appropriate fora through which communities
can give their inputs to decision making and any significant
changes in the policies and management of the Park;
· involve itself at all levels of community empowerment
and participation;
· facilitate the necessary support mechanisms
for community empowerment through external agencies
(Donor NGO's, Government, Private Sector) before allocating
its own resources;
· pro-actively identify and regularly expose
all business opportunities to communities through an
open-ended invitation and through a transparent and
user-friendly process;
· where feasible, create special programmes and
criteria that will give disadvantaged communities and
emerging entrepreneurs (including management buyouts),
preference of access to outsourcing contracts;
· in the case of tourism-based enterprises and
other direct operational opportunities within the Park,
limit its role in capacity building to that of a pro-active
facilitator, by procuring appropriate support mechanisms
within the private sector, NGO's, government and other
agencies;
· in the case of peripheral enterprises, support
services and industries, only be obliged to expose opportunities
to all neighbouring communities and emerging entrepreneurs.
1.3 STRATEGIES
Community participation, understanding and support will
be obtained through pro-actively implementing the following
strategies:
· Establishment of effective communication mechanisms
· Running an education and awareness programme
that will create the necessary understanding, appreciation
and support for the Park, its objectives and its operations
· Engaging in appropriate partnerships that will
access resources and capacities of community empowerment
support agencies
· Constantly identifying opportunities and inviting
communities and emerging entrepreneurs to participate
· Offering preference to communities and emerging
entrepreneurs through special selection procedures and
support programmes for identified community-based business
opportunities
· Identifying and optimally utilising the opportunity
to tap into the resources of external social programmes
that are aligned to the objectives and policies of the
Community Participation programmes (eg Poverty Relief,
Job Creation, etc)
1.4 OPERATIONAL GUIDELINES
1.4.1 Community Institutions
Pilanesberg National Park will maintain formal communication
links with communities through recognised and representative
(preferably existing regional and tribal) structures.
These structures will be allowed representation on the
Pilanesberg Communication Forum and their role is to
provide a formal communication link with affected communities
and to ensure that benefits are accessible to the entire
community.
1.4.2 Communication
The Park will regularly engage in two-way communication
with the recognised community institutions, allowing
regular;
- communication with the Park Warden
- dissemination of important information
- exposure to opportunities within the Park
- participation in decision making processes, planning
and management issues
- monitoring of community perceptions and attitudes.
Important community related information and programmes
will be regularly disseminated through appropriate printed,
electronic and other media. Target markets will include
appropriate support institutions, government agencies,
NGO's and politicians.
All identified opportunities will be regularly exposed
to communities and emerging entrepreneurs.
6.1.1 Awareness and education programme
The North West Parks and Tourism Board will facilitate
an appropriate education programme that will create
awareness, appreciation and support amongst all communities
of the North West Province, for the Protected Areas
and their conservation and tourism policies, objectives
and projects. The Park will provide access and make
available appropriate facilities and infrastructure
(ie Goldfields Education Centre and Bosele Camp) for
such a programme.
Such an education programme and its successes will constantly
be reviewed and improved; will build on previous experiences;
and where appropriate, will be integrated with programmes
of other government, NGO and private agencies. Appropriate
partners, donor organisations and support institutions
will therefore be identified and engaged in a joint
venture to limit the drain on Park resources. Education
related operations that are aligned with the park's
policies and strategies may be allowed access to the
Park and its infrastructure at special rates.
Special tailor-made programmes may be introduced for
identified target markets, such aschildren, community
leaders and structures, the business community, politicians,
the media and the general public.
A regular independent and professional assessment will
be done of trends in community perceptions and attitudes
towards the Park, to enable management to improve relations
with neighbouring communities.
6.1.2 Community Empowerment Partnerships
Where appropriate (refer policy), the Park will contractually
engage Government, NGO, private and other agencies to
establish the necessary support mechanisms and institutional
capacities that will facilitate entrepreneurial and
skills development and access to resources for local
communities and entrepreneurs. The Park may also assist
communities in establishing direct relationships with
such agencies. All relationships will be established
along predetermined guidelines and in accordance with
approved programmes that will be monitored at predetermined
stages and at regular intervals.
A database of support mechanisms and institutions in
the field of capacity building, community empowerment,
skills training and funding will be maintained and formal
relationships will be established with appropriate role
players.
6.1.3 Access to Commercial Opportunities within the
Park
Participation in commercial (business) opportunities
within the Park, by communities and emerging entrepreneurs,
will be pro-actively pursued. Therefore, a permanent
inventory will be kept of commercial opportunities available
to communities and SMME's inside the Park; of emerging
entrepreneurs within the community; and of potentials
for management buyouts.
The selection process will be through an open invitation
(instead of time limited once-off invitations) which
will be regularly communicated to the relevant stake
holders and will, through the selection criteria, be
in favour of community-based and emerging entrepreneurs.
Provided such an open invitation does exist and was
advertised less than 12 months ago, a proposal from
a community or emerging entrepreneur that meets all
the non-negotiable criteria, may be entertained by following
prescribed procedural guidelines for entering into a
formal agreement. The success of this programme will
be regularly monitored and re-assessed by the Park.
6.1.4 Park Communication Forum
It is a condition of lease that every concessionaire
and operator inside the Park is obliged to participate
in the Pilanesberg Communication Forum.
6.1.5 Employment and Small Business Development
Concessionaires inside the Park are obliged to optimise
community participation through the application of supportive
employment and business contract policies. This will
be a material condition of every lease and will automatically
be included in every existing contract that is assessed
for renewal.
6.1.6 Peripheral Commercial Opportunities
Commercial opportunities outside the Park will be pro-actively
identified on a regular basis and the potential for
entrepreneurial participation and other linkage opportunities
will be communicated to identified stake holders.
6.1.7 Utilising Social Programmes
Social programmes initiated by external organisations
(eg. Job creation, Poverty relief, training initiatives
and NGO support programmes) will be identified and tapped
into where it has the potential to support Park objectives,
strategies and projects.
6.1.8 Socioeconomic Survey
The Board will conduct an ongoing social survey in order
to identify the needs, skills and economic status of
the community as well as the population demographics.
This will provide baseline data on which fundamental
planning can be based and will also provide a benchmark
against which changes can be measured from time to time.
It will also provide indications as to what expectations
there are concerning the Park and what issues will need
to be addressed to deal with these needs or expectations.
This will involve ongoing monitoring as well as less
frequent but more intensive follow-up studies. These
will be co-ordinated by the Development Task Team or
Park Management.

10. INFRASTRUCTURE
1.1 VISION
The Board will be responsible for the development and
maintenance of general Park-, conservation and certain
bulk infrastructure, whilst the private sector is responsible
for tourism developments and related products within
the respective concession areas allocated to them.
1.2 POLICY
The Board will ensure that the conservation infrastructure
is developed and maintained throughout the entire Park.
The Board will decide on standards and quality required
and on the final placement of developments. This will
be done within budgetary constraints and according to
needs.
1.3 DEVELOPMENT & OPERATIONAL GUIDELINES
1.3.1 Standards & Responsibilities
As a general guideline, PNP Management Task Team will
ensure that most Park infrastructure, which is the Board's
responsibility, is developed according to plans and
budgets and Park Management will ensure that these are
maintained in good working order. The Board's commercial
arm will assist Park Management with monitoring and
controlling private sector developments.
1.3.2 Environmental Impact Assessments (EIA's)
Every development within PNP, whether undertaken by
PNP or by the Private Sector, will be subjected to the
formal EIA process as prescribed by the law, before
it can be approved and implemented, thus necessitating
full consideration of the overall Park Management Plan.
The developer is responsible for the cost of the EIA.
1.3.3 Roads
PNP Management Task Team will ensure that an appropriate
road network is developed and Park Management will ensure
they are maintained within the wildlife touring zone
and the communal use areas. Most of these will be gravelled
all-weather roads for use by sedan vehicles. Some may
be paved or treated with a dust repellent (sealer),
particularly on roads with high density use or as a
mechanism to disperse traffic.
The roads and tracks in the exclusive use areas will
be supplied and maintained by the lessee/s of the concession
area.
1.3.4 Staff Accommodation
Park Management will supply and maintain accommodation
for their own staff, according to Board policies. The
lodges and private developers are responsible for supplying
their own staff accommodation. If this is located within
PNP, then it must be located within their own exclusive
use area. Only staff who are directly involved with
day-to-day operations may be accommodated within PNP.
This accommodation must meet minimum industry standards
and must form part of the development plan.
In instances where lodges has to supply Board staff
with accommodation (eg. at special entrance gates),
it must be built and maintained according to Board standards.
1.3.5 Offices & Workshops
Park Management will operate offices and workshops within
the reserve for their own use as required. Should developers
require similar facilities for their own use, these
must be built according to the development plan in their
own exclusive use areas.
1.3.6 Services
Telephones, radios, electricity and water for use by
the lodges must be supplied, maintained and paid for
by the lodges and they must ensure they have sufficient
capacity to supply their needs. PNP will provide advice
and, where necessary, will endeavour to facilitate negotiations
with the relevant government departments in order to
get these services into the area. All those services
required for Park management will be supplied and maintained
from PNP's operational costs.
1.3.7 Aircraft
No airstrips will be allowed inside PNP. No aircraft
safaris will be permitted without the written consent
of Park Management, but generally would not be encouraged.
1.3.8 Visitor Facilities
Facilities, such as hides, picnic areas and waterholes
in exclusive use areas must be built and maintained
by the lessee with Park Management's written consent.
Should operators wish to construct facilities outside
these areas, this must be negotiated and agreed to in
writing with other operators in PNP on the principle
that it is a communal facility and therefore available
and accessible to all. Maintenance of those facilities,
however, will be to the cost of the lodges. PNP Management
Task Team will ensure waterholes and/or dams are supplied
in the wilderness zone, the wildlife touring zone and
the communal use areas, according to the water plan
for game. Park Management will ensure that these are
maintained. Park Management, in consultation with the
reserve's ecologist, will control and regulate these
facilities.
1.3.9 Fencing
PNP Management Task Team will ensure that adequate fencing
is provided to contain the animals that occur in PNP.
Park Management will ensure that this is maintained
in good condition. All Board staff accommodation and
facilities will be protected from wild animals where
relevant. Once again, the lodges are responsible for
ensuring the safety of their own staff and guests and
should fence these areas adequately. Should they not
be fenced, then the Board will not be liable for any
claims that may arise from damage to property, injury
or loss of life. Erection and maintenance of fencing
of private property outside the formally proclaimed
Park, will be agreed to according to the conservation
priority the Board places on the land.
1.3.10 Entrance Gates
All entries into PNP will be under the control of the
Board, although certain functions may be out sourced.
Should developers wish to have additional gates other
than those already present, then the implementation,
maintenance and staffing costs will be borne by the
developers. This includes Board staff accommodation
and salaries and any other costs, if deemed necessary
by Park Management.
1.3.11 Other Infrastructure
The Board will only construct structures necessary for
management purposes (eg. dams, weirs, waterholes, etc.).
Should private developers wish to develop structures
other than in their own exclusive use areas, this must
be negotiated in consultation with other developers
and Park Management. Park Management, however, has the
final say.
1.3.12 Siting of Lodges
The lodges and camps should ideally (but not necessarily)
be on or as close to the periphery of PNP as possible,
to reduce the impact of support services and to reduce
the pressures on the central basin. As a general rule,
the greater the impact, the closer to the periphery
should the developments be. The costs of providing support
services will be borne by the developer.
1.3.13 Infrastructure Related to Staff & Visitor
Safety
The lodges are responsible for the safety of their guests,
their staff and their families at all times. This includes
providing appropriate fencing around facilities and
providing adequate security on game drives or walks.
Should the lodge decide not to fence their facilities
and provide other protective measures, the Board will
not be held liable for any losses or claims within their
areas.
1.3.14 Visitor Safety and Security
The Board will maintain a secure entry control system,
so that visitors and their belongings can be safe and
secure. The Board and the concessionaires will collaborate
to maintain a high level of security and safety for
their visitors within PNP and each party is responsible
for appropriate indemnity insurance at his own cost.

11. LAND EXPANSION AND INCORPORATION
1.4 VISION
The area available for conservation and for viable ecotourism
operations should be as large as possible.
1.5 POLICY
The Board should acquire as much land as is feasible
under its title. However, if private landowners or communities
wish to have their land 'fenced into' PNP (but still
retain their little) and thereby allow the game to have
unhindered access and allow compatible land management
practices and ecotourism operations on their land, then
this should be allowed subject to certain conditions.
1.6 OPERATIONAL GUIDELINES
1.6.1 Objective
The Development Task Team should endeavour to obtain
all land within PNP under formal Board title.
It is recognised that certain expansion opportunities
exist along the periphery of PNP that may add significantly
to the biodiversity and the size of PNP. Every effort
should be made to ensure that these areas are 'incorporated
into' PNP, as this can expand the socio-economic benefits
from PNP through new tourism projects and can offer
new commercial opportunities for neighbouring communities
and land owners.
1.6.2 Conditions of Agreement
For land that is owned by individuals
or communities who wish to have their land incorporated
into the reserve by means of fencing it in, then this
may be done subject to an agreement that includes inter
alia the following conditions:
· the land must be fenced according to Board
specifications and maintained in this condition at the
landowner's cost;
· damaged fence must be repaired immediately
or reported to Park Management. Should there be any
breakouts of dangerous game, these must be reported
immediately to Park Management;
· the fenced-in area must be registered against
the title deed, detailing what restrictions have been
imposed on developments and use of the property. These
may only be altered with the Chief Executive Officer's
approval;
· if private land is fenced into PNP and should
the landowner's neighbour/s wish to join PNP, the landowner
must agree to have the fence removed to allow game access
to his/her neighbour's property;
· for a specified time, no hunting is permitted
for any game that did not occur on the property before
incorporation into PNP. This time will vary depending
on the species involved. Other game may be hunted only
if a quota has been set for PNP. PNP's ecologist will
decide on numbers to be removed annually. The landowner
will then be given a quota to hunt on his/her land only.
This quota will be set in proportion to the amount of
game he/she had at the time of incorporation compared
with the population in the greater Park. These figures
must be mutually agreed to. Should portions of animal
quotas be left, these will be allocated by means of
a random draw. Hunting will then only be permitted with
permits issued by Park Management;
· no hunting is permitted within one kilometre
of the reserve boundary; changing or erection of any
fences may only be done with the Chief Executive Officer's
approval;
· lodges and other tourist facilities that are
built on private land are allowed access to PNP under
similar conditions and fees as are charged to other
operators in PNP. As a general rule, this should be
encouraged as it reduces the impact of the developments
in PNP. However, at least 60% of the number of lodges
using PNP should be built in PNP itself; and
· Board staff must have free access to the property
at all times to inspect the fence and game.

12. REFERENCES
The following reference documents were
used during the situation analysis process upon which
this Management Plan was based:
Act No. 3 of 1997 : North West Parks
and Tourism Act, 1997
Boonzaaier WV, Collinson RFH &
Van Riet WF, A Five Year Development Plan for PNP, Sept
1983
Boonzaaier WV, North West Province
Tourism Master Plan - Situational Analysis, Implications
& Recommended Programmes, 1998
Boonzaaier WV, Platinum SDI Tourism
Study - Updated Summary Report, 1998
Boonzaaier WV & J, Analysis and
Comparison of Tourism Densities in PNP, 1999
Boonzaaier WV & Collinson RFH,
Pilanesberg National Park Management Series: Volume
II - Situation Analysis, 1999
Collinson RFH & Goodman P, Inkwe
No 1., Environmental Research in Bophuthatswana, 1982
Conservation Sub-committee, Conservation
Policy of the North West Parks & Tourism Board,
1999
Davies R, et al, A Review of the Protected
Areas under the Control of the North West Parks and
Tourism Board, 1998
Farrel and Van Riet, PNP Bophuthatswana
- Planning and Management Proposals, August 1978
Garry White Associates, The Protected
Areas Division of the North West Province Parks and
Tourism Board - Strategic Planning and Organisation
Development, 1998
Madikwe Development Task Team, Madikwe
Development Series - No2: The Madikwe Game Reserve Management
Plan, 1997
PNP 1st draft Management Manual (PMM),
1997
PNP Management Plan (Strategic Level),
1995
Vorhies D & F, Introducing Lion
into PNP: an Economic Assessment, 1993
REACT Surveys, Results of Telephonic
Research for North West Parks Board, March 1998
September 2000 |